Like today, May 1, newspapers do not go (bah , come from the hegemonic multimedia operators who do not even respect the holiday by the International Labor Day), I thought it would be cool to provide some Sunday reading for my friends and comrades s, as virtually any misinformation sepoy @ consummated made with the same obsequiousness than those originating enlisted soldiers in the armies English, French, English and Portuguese during colonization.
And as chivalry is not submission and gentleness is not always flattering, thank you in advance to Donna De UCEA for having suggested that concerns a subject that emerges every so often and which rarely gives definitions: 
And you, what do you think about term limits?
and specify the "rotation" because the rules in our subcontinent tend to allow even a possibility of reelection for presidents, governors and mayors, as such, and forgive the repetition, and immediate succession. However, there are no limitations on 2x1 systems: two consecutive periods of no application to the same office in an intermediate.
2. What are the traditional rationale for supporting the constitutional principle of no reelection indefinitely?
Some constituents say prefixed or prefixed to the Freedom of the Nation, paradoxically arguing that staying in office wear, corrupts and leads to tyranny faced with civil liberties. No longer a fallacy preach freedom based on censorship of citizens to elect or be elected.
Other conventional shysters erected in the place of knowledge course, argue that if a / official to return to aspire to elective office, hinders others as democratic citizens the right to be elected. And again we can say that it is a paradoxical trick banning in the name of freedom.
scholars there are those apologists of alternation, calling it a way to foster a dynamic presumably the state. Entering the field of subjectivity, it can be conjectured that the dynamics do not understand the relationship between forces that induce movement, but as forced displacement.
As a corollary it is argued that the defenders of the no re-election shows no other position that the impairment of the ability of citizens to evaluate and plebiscite to government, reducing the repostulación as implying automatic resumption rather than the chance to democratically decide the continuity of a partial model or its modification or change for another.
It is acceptable to assume that they do knowing that the succession must favor the interests of socio-political groups that make up or protect, which in any way manage to hold onto power or electoral validate their efforts. And the latter is the realm of subjectivity, it is perfectly verifiable traversing the history of countries not Anglo-Saxon America, where the envoys of the establishment endured by de facto government but not more than two periods, which are not few, with mandates de jure.
3. What are the most common rebuttals and what answer the apologists of the ban in the name of freedom?
addition to the previously stated, there are countless examples of nations that the establishment itself valued as "very high cultural level, awareness and commitment to his country" which does not restrict the option to reapply for the same function public as often as you like and be reelected as often as win the election.
Leaders of the American intelligentsia set out loudly that "in those nations, governments are mostly parliamentarians, not as presidential systems of underdeveloped countries that end in fascist tyrannies when they govern long time."
If you are rethinking that such a foundation, in addition to undervaluing our societies exhibiting a clear bias, is at least uncertain because no government check reelected indefinitely and assimilates to the persistent dictatorships of the last century, or false because in those countries parliamentary republics models things are not so democratic nor fair display as intended.
For examples:
incidents in several French cities and the rest of Europe in 2005 , after two Muslim youths of African origin died pursued by the police and the then Minister of Interior -subsequently awarded the Head of State, "the descendant of Austro-Hungarian republicanísimo Sarkozy given that xenophobic discourse trying to slag the protesters, the electoral support for the Supreme Guida di comunicazione, the wildly successful Berlusconi, even after having put the segregationist
"inmigrati pulite" as the main theme of the 2007 presidential campaign
perhaps satirizing its preventive abandonment of the "mani pulite" of Bettino Craxi 15 years previously, the 50 million newly unemployed on the planet, after the crash in 2008 of the speculative financial system promoted by the global banking
, which affects the entire planet, from the technological powerful unified Germany to the European Union vans as Spain, Portugal , Ireland and Greece , and other countries that were imposed as role models for the world developed, the subjugation liberalism exerted by the United States over much of the globe, blocking and embargo against Cuba , East invading, bombing innocent people, occupying territories to exploit their riches and giving many clear examples of defense of human rights (of human Imperial) by the Nobel Peace Prize-Barack Obama-daily diluting the differences with its predecessor, the inequality between citizens of the United Kingdom, ringing without pause during the recent "Royal Wedding" that too anxious sudacas followed by yellow press, however, would not comment on the threat of "bobbies" protesters , following the systematic concealment of data and misrepresentation of reality governed by the SIP - Society Inter American Press - , satellite journalistic Pentagon and the State Secretariat of the United States. And they can spend millions of characters on the web and face-to-face voices to further exemplify, but for the fanatical followers of the other Nobel Prize for Literature, is clear-Mario Vargas Llosa and other luminaries of the establishment would not be enough. One answer is this, which refers to random given by the newspaper "La Nacion" in 2006 . Of course the article skews clarify to which Franklin Roosevelt ruled distracted four periods in a row in the U.S. since 1932 (reelected in 1936, '40 and '44) to the controversial stroke suffered in 1945, states that no more than half of the United States does not impose limits on their governors repostulación. Neither refers to Thatcher, the Iron Lady of England, and many long leaders. Much less, the comfortable Canada and other countries of the developed North that dedicates itself to amend its Constitution allows indefinite re-election.
4. Would you address the arguments were synthesized on either position? Does it seem reasonable objections and their rebuttals against?
hacks is believed that the reissues of "Legal status of colonialism," enduring American corporation of heralds repeating diagnostic facing out-do not conform to the realities and interests exhibited favorable to our continent.
In Argentina, as in other countries in the region, from the restoration of democracy, a process started, slowly but surely, certainly, participation and civic engagement. The global hegemonic power, especially after the nationalization crystallize private debts, and has no specific intention to impose military dictators ruling obedient to his mandate, since the 80s that materialized as hard to break ties. Also, increasingly, also decrease the chance of investing them electorally, because the reflexes and resistance exercise contributes to people, although equipped with modern appliances with artificial mechanisms accelerated clocks and voltages in treacherously damped branches of the imperial gym.
In short, traditional conservatism is concerned with changes in social paradigms and models of governance in the south of the Tropic of Cancer, after having spent two centuries, with very few pauses immediately aborted coal-shoveling in the train of capitalism. From Condoleezza Rice to Dominique Strauss-Kahn, from Barack Obama Angela Merkel, from Gonzalo Marroquín (
President SIP) to the last type of Hector Magnetto (
CEO of Grupo Clarin ), no manage to hide the concern the strong recovery of the values \u200b\u200bproposed by Bolivar, Mariátegui, Marti and many more.
The old submission isolated and marginalized moved to the inclusive approach to regional potentialities and rushing over their own weaknesses. The advice of the Washington Consensus retrograde bartered for reciprocity of UNASUR. The FTAA and ALBA ... The right of the mercantile bourgeoisie-their lords and their vassals north-south does not see with pleasure that dominate this part of presidents who advocate social justice, redistribution of income, equity and premise and considering diversity as an opportunity for community growth, the re-nationalization of enterprises run by multinational parasitic looted wealth, debt renegotiations with the World Bank made from positions that pose an equal and many questions of their daily demonstrate that Latin America deck and given again and went out, cutting out.
What is the problem for a / a citizen exercising his right to elect and be elected / as many times as you want? Did the people is not the sovereign? Indoctrinating the self-appointed freedom, which ones are convinced that bases are protectors of the republic?
hope your opinion. This note aims to be a trigger as a tester, as such, we measure to evaluate how well new meaning to concepts to try inexorable contradictions crumble altogether.
Greetings. Happy Labor Day!
0 comments:
Post a Comment